Thursday, June 12, 2025
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
Environmental Magazine
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water
No Result
View All Result
Environmental Magazine
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water
No Result
View All Result
Environmental Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Tortuous progress: Key takeaways from COP28

December 21, 2023
in News
A A

December’s COP28 event in Dubai took place against a backdrop of global emissions continuing to rise at a rate of 1.5% per year, when they need to be falling by 7% every year to 2030, according to some estimates, to keep alive the hopes of the Paris agreement. Commentators were concerned about the decisive role seemingly prepared for carbon removal technologies.

The headline commitment of COP28 was the pledge to transition away from fossil fuels. It was described as “a historic milestone” by Sir David King, Founder and Chair of the Climate Crisis Advisory Group, and “a development that seemed all but impossible even two years ago.”

“But we must be mindful that this is the bare minimum,” he said. Many commentators also appeared to believe that the “UAE Consensus” – as the deal was dubbed – leaves plenty of scope to continue burning fossil fuels, while also being woefully short on the financial commitments required to realize its aims. King continued: “Ensuring 1.5C remains viable will require total commitment to a range of far-reaching measures, including full fossil fuel phase-out, massive investment in nature, transformation of global food systems, and carbon removal on a massive scale.”

Fossil fuels were mentioned for the first time in a COP text two years ago, at COP26 in Glasgow. As Alexis McGivern of the University of Oxford observed in the days preceding the conclusion of this year’s event, “COP28 is the battle ground for language over ‘fossil fuel phase out’ to be included in any final agreement.”

Would this be accompanied by the word “unabated”, she wondered, referring to fossil fuel emissions that are not immediately sucked up by carbon capture methods. The word’s appearance would put carbon removal at the centre of achieving the aims of the Paris agreement, she said, although there is no firm agreement on what it means.

Indeed the final wording of the document lists one of the actions as: “Rapidly phasing down unabated coal and limiting the permitting of new and unabated coal power generation.” And this was one element of the resulting deal that worried many observers that fossil fuel companies were being let off the hook, and that carbon removal was being moved into a more decisive role.

“Our climate, health and development goals remain unachievable as long as we are still produc- ing fossil fuels,” said McGivern.

Embracing the suck
CCS was pegged as “controversial” by many newspapers and commentators covering the event, but appears to be a relatively widely-accepted fixture on the mitigation horizon. Oxford University’s Professor Myles Allen FRS, even chided the climate establishment for taking umbrage at COP president Sultan Al Jaber’s comments during the event, that there is no science behind demands for a fossil fuel-phase out.

“To limit warming even close to 1.5C, we must both scale down the use of fossil fuels and scale up safe and permanent carbon dioxide disposal.

“It’s simply not true that to stop global warming we have to stop using fossil fuels: what we have to do is stop dumping the carbon dioxide they generate into the atmosphere.”

“All 1.5ºC scenarios that allow it have us still using fossil fuels past 2100, long after we have stopped them causing further global warming by disposing of all the CO2 they generate back underground.

“Everyone including Sultan Al Jaber, agrees we will stop using fossil fuels eventually. The question is whether we can do it fast enough to avoid exceeding the 1.5ºC carbon budget by reducing carbon dioxide production alone. And he’s right, we can’t. We will generate too much CO2 so we will have to get rid of the excess. That’s what the science says.”

Indeed almost all decarbonization scenarios that keep 1.5ºC in sight contain some degree of CCS, either for capturing emissions at source or removing them from the atmosphere using things like DAC (or both). It’s with the amount of CCS to be used that opinion appears to vary widely.

Too-heavy reliance on CCS is ill-advised, says study
The decisive issue here should be cost, according to Oxford University’s Dr Rupert Way.
“Any hopes that the cost of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) will decline in a similar way to renewable technologies such as solar and batteries appear misplaced.”

“Our findings indicate a lack of technological learning in any part of the process, from CO2 capture to burial, even though all elements of the chain have been in use for decades.”

A study published by his group in early December estimates the costs of high-CCS vs low-CCS scenarios. Its findings indicate that opting for a low-CCS route will be vastly less expensive than a high-CCS pathway, providing savings of around $1 trillion per year. But this doesn’t mean a no-CCS route is even better.

In short, the document concludes that we need to get serious about CCS and start building, increasing the current build rate significantly but only targeting it towards key sectors, such as cement, and “banishing the idea that CCS is, or ever can be, a blanket solution.”

There was also some disquiet from observers at the agreement’s mention of “transitional fuels” – presumed by most to mean natural gas – which it is said “can play a role in facilitating the energy transition while ensuring energy security.”

Kusile-Power-Station

One concern was that lower-income nations could end up saddled with debt from gas infrastructure they would not be allowed to use, as Diann Black-Layne, a delegate from Antigua and Barbuda noted in comments reported by NewScientst.

Another source of frustration was the lack of any progress on carbon markets. Participants were unable to reach agreement on a universally-agreed framework that would enable a global mechanism for carbon trading. Hæge Fjellheim, head of carbon analysis at Veyt, said this was “a setback in carbon credit project development and leaves investors floundering”.

One apparent positive was on renewables with the “tripling pledge”, with apparent consensus from 100 countries to step up their ambition on the deployment of technologies like solar and wind, described as “unprecedented” by Global Solar Council CEO Sonia Dunlop, and “a big win for the energy transition.”

Other celebrated gains included a data-driven conservation initiative, with commitments to “integrate biodiversity metrics into climate action”.

ShareTweetSharePinSendShare

Related Articles

News

Recycled solar panels and heat loss detecting drones among £2m Manchester Prize AI finalists

June 12, 2025
News

UK tech job market rebounds with AI boom, finds Accenture

June 9, 2025
News

Construction emerges as major source of black carbon in central London

June 9, 2025
News

Four in five ecologists in England feel undervalued by government, industry survey finds

June 6, 2025
News

MPs warn of dangerous delays and soaring costs at Sellafield

June 5, 2025
News

Circular copper recovery could bridge 3.6 MT supply gap, says McKinsey

June 4, 2025

Recommended

GOP Lawmakers Seek to Roll Back Methane Fee

February 6, 2025

Methane-eating bacteria can produce low emission fuel from from toxic gas

March 26, 2022

Don't miss it

Energy

Tax Cuts in the “Big Beautiful Bill” Could Kill Solar Power Progress 

June 12, 2025
Energy

Bills That Could Have Hurt Renewable Energy Die in Texas Legislature

June 12, 2025
Fossil Fuels

Developers Propose More Than 100 New Gas Power Plants in Texas

June 11, 2025
Water

Profiling the growing use of AI in public-sector WWTPs

June 11, 2025
Water

Blockage-detecting robot ready to patrol sewers, says group behind it

June 11, 2025
Activism

Across the Country, Locals Rally to Protect National Monuments Threatened by the Trump Administration

June 10, 2025
Environmental Magazine

Environmental Magazine, Latest News, Opinions, Analysis Environmental Magazine. Follow us for more news about Enviroment and climate change from all around the world.

Learn more

Sections

  • Activism
  • Air
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Fossil Fuels
  • News
  • Uncategorized
  • Water

Topics

Activism Air Climate Change Energy Fossil Fuels News Uncategorized Water

Recent News

Tax Cuts in the “Big Beautiful Bill” Could Kill Solar Power Progress 

June 12, 2025

Bills That Could Have Hurt Renewable Energy Die in Texas Legislature

June 12, 2025

© 2023 Environmental Magazine. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water

© 2023 Environmental Magazine. All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.