Tuesday, June 3, 2025
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
Environmental Magazine
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water
No Result
View All Result
Environmental Magazine
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water
No Result
View All Result
Environmental Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home Climate Change

Government greenhouse gas targets offer heavy emitters a free pass

March 29, 2022
in Climate Change
A A

Current government policy on technologies that suck carbon out of the air could see heavy emitters dodge their responsibilities to cut emissions, the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) warns Ministers today.

At present, targets for greenhouse gas reductions and removal targets are combined, offering little incentive for industries to prioritise cutting emissions when the future option of negative emission technologies (NETs) is there.

The EAC has written to Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng to demand the government reviews its approach.

Environmental Audit Committee Chairman, Rt Hon Philip Dunne MP, said: ‘Through our work, it is clear that Government thinking on negative emissions technologies needs to be developed. These technologies will play an important role in meeting net zero, because to maintain viability of our steel and cement sectors they need to find ways to restrict the volume of greenhouse gases they emit.

‘Presently there is little in terms of incentive, and very little in terms of any Government direction or clarity. The fact that removal and reduction targets are combined enables many sectors averse or unable to cut emissions to dodge their responsibilities. Transparency and accountability must be improved by separating these targets out and highlighting the work that needs to be done.

‘The sector is raring to go as soon as the Government offers direction and clarity, but with so many unknowns we can understand why deployment of NETs in the UK is yet to gain traction.’

The EAC added that they recognise the value in using NETs in industries such as steel and cement, where options to decarbonise are often more limited, but MPs argue that the government is failing to take swift enough action to roll out technologies, with both BECCS (bioenergy with carbon capture and storage) and DACCS (direct air carbon capture and storage) at close to zero levels of deployment in the UK.

Having reviewed the evidence it received on the issue, the EAC is concerned that Government thinking in this area has been limited and opportunities risk being missed. The Government is yet to specify what sectors could benefit from NETS, and there is currently no direction on the transport and infrastructure projects that are necessary to roll out NETs.

Net zero cannot be met without technologies to remove emissions from hard-to-decarbonise sectors. The EAC heard that the UK was well situated to deliver engineered greenhouse gas removals, given its access to some of the best geological storage in Europe.

The sector is asking for economic support to generate private investment to allow projects to go further and the Committee is pressing the government to set out a strategy for this.

Photo by Marek Piwnicki

Subscribe to our newsletter

ShareTweetSharePinSendShare

Related Articles

Climate Change

In Virginia, Democratic Lawmakers Clash With Youngkin Over RGGI Membership, Flood Relief

February 10, 2025
Climate Change

‘America at War With Itself’: Humanitarian, Climate Aid Becomes Flashpoint in a Battle for Control of U.S. Government

February 4, 2025
Climate Change

Trump Moves Again to Exit the Paris Agreement. Here’s What That Means

January 21, 2025
Climate Change

Trump’s Executive Orders on Climate Will Likely Face Legal Challenges, but Already Threaten Global Fallout

January 21, 2025
Climate Change

‘We Needed More Time’: As Biden Leaves Office, His Climate Legacy Remains Incomplete

January 19, 2025
Climate Change

Border Agency Seeks Solutions With Mexico on Water, Sewage Problems

January 5, 2025

Recommended

With Clean Energy Stalled, Can New Jersey Bet on Nuclear and Win?

May 27, 2025

Jessica Middlemiss hired to help deliver cutting-edge technology

December 3, 2024

Don't miss it

Energy

Trump’s Budget Wish Could Threaten Billions in Clean Energy Investment in Virginia

June 2, 2025
Fossil Fuels

The Massive Pipeline Buildout in the U.S. Is Mostly for Gas Going Overseas

June 2, 2025
News

Breakthrough geopolymer turns recycled glass and construction waste into a high-performance cement replacement

June 2, 2025
Energy

Gila River Tribes Intend to Float Solar Panels on a Reservoir. Could the Technology Help the Colorado River?

June 1, 2025
Fossil Fuels

U.S. Steel Is a Major Source of Pollution in Pennsylvania. Will Its Sale Lock in Emissions for Another Generation?

May 30, 2025
Activism

Trump Executive Orders Violate Young People’s Rights to a Stable Climate, a Lawsuit Alleges

May 30, 2025
Environmental Magazine

Environmental Magazine, Latest News, Opinions, Analysis Environmental Magazine. Follow us for more news about Enviroment and climate change from all around the world.

Learn more

Sections

  • Activism
  • Air
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Fossil Fuels
  • News
  • Uncategorized
  • Water

Topics

Activism Air Climate Change Energy Fossil Fuels News Uncategorized Water

Recent News

Trump’s Budget Wish Could Threaten Billions in Clean Energy Investment in Virginia

June 2, 2025

The Massive Pipeline Buildout in the U.S. Is Mostly for Gas Going Overseas

June 2, 2025

© 2023 Environmental Magazine. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water

© 2023 Environmental Magazine. All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.