Monday, June 30, 2025
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
Environmental Magazine
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water
No Result
View All Result
Environmental Magazine
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water
No Result
View All Result
Environmental Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home Fossil Fuels

Congress Set to Vote on Repeal of Biden Administration Climate Regulations

February 26, 2025
in Fossil Fuels
A A

Congress is scheduled to vote on two bills this week that would roll back climate regulations issued in the final months of the Biden administration. The agencies that implemented the rules, which limit methane emissions from the oil and gas sector and set efficiency standards for water heaters, expected them to prevent tens of millions of tons of climate pollution in coming decades if left in place.

The votes would be two of the first attempts by the new Congress to use a legislative tool under the Congressional Review Act, which allows lawmakers to nullify certain regulations with a simple majority vote, as long as the president signs the resolution.

Already, Republicans in Congress have targeted 29 final rules enacted in the waning days of the Biden administration with Congressional Review Act resolutions, according to the Center for Progressive Reform, a left-leaning research and advocacy group that has launched a tracker of these resolutions. The act also permanently prevents agencies from adopting “substantially” similar rules in the future without Congressional authority.

GOP lawmakers have targeted climate and environmental regulations in particular—17 out of 41 resolutions introduced so far would repeal rules by the Environmental Protection Agency or Department of Energy, according to the tracker.

We’re hiring!

Please take a look at the new openings in our newsroom.

See jobs

Republicans in Congress have said the regulations are driving up costs for consumers. While the rules impose some costs, Biden administration agencies had said the rules would ultimately save consumers money by preventing wasteful gas leaks and making appliances use less fuel.

One resolution set for a vote would repeal a fee on methane emissions by oil and gas companies. When it announced the final rule in November, the EPA said the fee would reduce methane emissions by 1.2 million metric tons through 2035. Because methane is a highly potent greenhouse gas, that is equal to cutting 34 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over the same period, or the annual emissions of 8 million gas-powered cars.

Supporters of the fee say that in addition to cutting climate pollution, it would save money and create jobs for people working to plug leaky oil and gas equipment. The elimination of the fee could also hurt gas exports because it could make American gas run afoul of European standards for methane leaks. 

Losing the fee would be “a big setback,” said Federico Holm, clean energy policy analyst at the Center for Progressive Reform.

But the oil industry and its supporters criticized the fee. After Donald Trump was elected president and Republicans won control of Congress in November, the American Petroleum Institute said that repealing the methane fee was one of its top priorities.

Earlier this month, U.S. Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) and U.S. Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas) introduced resolutions to repeal the fee. Hoeven said in a statement that “we are working to get our nation back on the right track, providing needed regulatory and tax relief to deliver real cost savings to American energy producers and consumers.” 

With the bill slated for a vote this week, Amanda Eversole, executive vice president and chief advocacy officer for the American Petroleum Institute, said in a statement, “We look forward to continuing to work together to fully repeal this punitive tax and advance a pro-consumer regulatory approach that embraces U.S. energy.”

The other resolution set for a vote would repeal efficiency standards for tankless water heaters set by the Energy Department. The department said the rule would save consumers $112 over the life of a water heater, savings that would take an estimated nine years to reap given higher up-front costs. While compliance with the rule would cost the industry $20.4 million, the department said, it would reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 32 million metric tons over 30 years.

The Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute, which represents appliance manufacturers, is opposed to repealing the regulation. Francis J. Dietz, the institute’s vice president for public affairs, said his members had worked with the Energy Department to craft the new standards.

“Once that happens, manufacturers start planning for how they are going to meet those new standards,” Dietz said. “If you have a situation where that process is upended, and all those plans go out the window, then that is bad for manufacturers.”

But the American Gas Association, which represents gas utilities, opposed the regulation, which was finalized last month. And Trump has been a vocal critic of appliance efficiency standards. Last week, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright called out the water heater rule during a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference, saying it would make one type of popular water heater “illegal” and sink the company that makes it.

Congressional Review Act resolutions, which can be used only on regulations enacted within the last 60 working days, can tie the hands of agency staff. The methane fee was required by the Inflation Reduction Act, the Biden administration’s signature climate legislation, while the water heater standards are also required by law. In both cases, then, agencies would be compelled to replace the rules if they are repealed by Congress.

But the Congressional Review Act’s prohibition against “substantially” similar rules force agencies to walk a fine line, said James Goodwin, policy director for the Center for Progressive Reform, in an email. 

“The upshot is that the eventual replacement will be ‘weaker,’” Goodwin said.

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Nicholas Kusnetz

Reporter, New York City

Nicholas Kusnetz is a reporter for Inside Climate News. Before joining ICN, he worked at the Center for Public Integrity and ProPublica. His work has won numerous awards, including from the Society of Environmental Journalists, the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the Society of American Business Editors and Writers, and has appeared in more than a dozen publications, including The Washington Post, Businessweek, The Nation, Fast Company and The New York Times.

ShareTweetSharePinSendShare

Related Articles

Fossil Fuels

The Danger of Losing the EPA’s Endangerment Finding

June 28, 2025
Fossil Fuels

Trump Joins the Opposition to Vermont’s Climate Superfund Act, Calling it ‘Burdensome’ and ‘Ideologically Motivated’

June 27, 2025
Fossil Fuels

Five Years After Pennsylvania’s Landmark Fracking Report, Its Public Health Goals Remain Largely Unmet, Groups Say

June 26, 2025
Fossil Fuels

Texas Legislature Increases Well Plugging Budget as Backlog Grows

June 25, 2025
Fossil Fuels

As GOP Tries to Pass Tax Bill, Senate Includes Billions in Benefits for Oil Industry

June 23, 2025
Fossil Fuels

Scientists’ Letter Urges Brazil’s President Lula to Reject New Amazon and Offshore Drilling

June 21, 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Opinion: Climate change messaging – is the government getting it right?

March 31, 2022

Virginia Has the Biggest Data Center Market in the World. Can It Also Decarbonize Its Grid?

May 24, 2024

Don't miss it

Activism

Truckers Say Oil and Gas Companies Are Violating Hazardous Materials Transport Regulations

June 29, 2025
Energy

Texas’ Risk of Summer Blackouts Reduced Thanks to Solar and Batteries

June 28, 2025
Activism

‘Systematically Failed’: Civil Society’s Latest Attempt to Reform UN Climate Talks

June 27, 2025
News

UK government body to deploy innovative robotics to manage radioactive waste

June 27, 2025
News

Squaring the circle: Making sense of the UK Industrial Strategy

June 27, 2025
News

Make electricity cheaper for consumers, says CCC

June 26, 2025
Environmental Magazine

Environmental Magazine, Latest News, Opinions, Analysis Environmental Magazine. Follow us for more news about Enviroment and climate change from all around the world.

Learn more

Sections

  • Activism
  • Air
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Fossil Fuels
  • News
  • Uncategorized
  • Water

Topics

Activism Air Climate Change Energy Fossil Fuels News Uncategorized Water

Recent News

Truckers Say Oil and Gas Companies Are Violating Hazardous Materials Transport Regulations

June 29, 2025

Texas’ Risk of Summer Blackouts Reduced Thanks to Solar and Batteries

June 28, 2025

© 2023 Environmental Magazine. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water

© 2023 Environmental Magazine. All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.