In recent months, residents in Texas rushed a community meeting to challenge a nearby wind proposal. In Indiana, more than 70 people joined a lawsuit to stop a solar project in their town. And in Michigan, the state approved language for a ballot initiative that would repeal a law that gave the state authority to permit or approve large renewable energy projects even if rejected by local governments.
An expanding body of research suggests these disagreements are part of a trend, rather than isolated incidents. As solar and wind projects are proposed in more places, more communities seem to be deciding they don’t want anything to do with them. Though these residents are not the majority, members of the industry, along with policymakers and researchers, worry that such increased challenges will slow the overall pace of decarbonization and efforts to respond to climate change.
A recently released survey from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory adds some fresh evidence and details about the phenomenon. Community opposition and local ordinances are among the top reasons for delays and cancellations of wind and solar projects, according to the survey of industry professionals who helped develop about half of all large renewable projects from 2016 to 2023 in the United States.
We’re hiring!
Please take a look at the new openings in our newsroom.
See jobs
“Previously, a lot of the bottleneck to deployment of renewables was the cost,” said Sarah Mills, an associate professor and researcher at the University of Michigan who focuses on energy land use planning, zoning and policymaking. “As the costs of renewables have come down, I think that the newest bottleneck has been social acceptance.” Mills is not an author of the new survey, published in January, although she has collaborated with its authors on other research.
Survey respondents noted that about a third of wind and solar applications were canceled in the face of community opposition. About half were delayed six months or more, according to the respondents.
The trend of community pushback on renewables projects is a complex one, in part because in numerous polls, a majority of Americans support building more wind and solar projects. A 2023 Washington Post/ University of Maryland poll found that the majority of people, regardless of political party, also said they wouldn’t mind having those projects built in their communities.
But community opposition is still impeding projects, according to the Berkeley Lab survey of 123 builders from 62 companies. “For both wind and solar, opposition is becoming more prevalent and is more expensive to address than it was five years ago,” the survey found. “Developers expect this trend to continue, becoming even more prevalent in the next five years.” The permit process often prompted pushback, respondents said, and failures can be costly. The survey found that the average expenses that could not be recovered from cancellations were about $2 million per solar project and $7.5 million per wind project.
Mills and other researchers are trying to understand the flashpoints.“An energy transition is going to require building lots of stuff, and it’s going to go into communities,” Mills said. “Understanding the patterns that we see in how communities respond will help make that transition easier.”
When evaluating a location for wind turbines or solar panels, developers often prioritize wide-open land. They also need ready access to the existing electrical grid and transmission lines to carry electricity to homes and businesses. In the Berkeley Lab survey, grid interconnection was the most commonly cited reason for solar project cancellation and for both wind and solar delays. But community support has become an increasingly important element.
For both wind and solar projects, community opposition and restrictive local ordinances or zoning were among the top three reasons for delays and cancellations, the survey found. The majority of respondents in the Berkeley Lab survey indicated that community opposition was most likely coming from a vocal small group; some respondents felt opposition often originated outside of the community. (Fossil fuel interests have been linked, in media reports and other published research, to attempting to influence local opinion on large renewables projects in rural areas.)
The most common concerns raised about renewables vary depending on whether a project is wind or solar, according to Mills, but many are “rooted in the same thing, which is people wondering what kind of impact a large wind or solar project is going to have on their quality of life.” The Berkeley Lab survey found that developers—when reviewing why projects were canceled—recognized they needed to involve communities earlier.
In past research on wind construction in the Midwest, Mills found that opposition may be lower in areas with fewer “natural amenities,” such as lakes, ponds and rolling hills. In communities where land is largely used for industry or farming, she found, residents may be more amenable to renewable construction.
But there are few hard and fast rules about opposition, and some developers in the Berkeley Lab survey said they found it difficult to predict how communities may react. Mills said that different communities—and the people living within them—can differ about whether a renewable project is a benefit or a burden. Renewable projects can reduce pollution and fight climate change. They can also change landscapes and traffic patterns.
This story is funded by readers like you.
Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.
Donate Now
Numerous researchers examining social acceptance of renewables have also found inequality plays a role. A research paper published in 2023 examined wind projects built in North America—in both Canada and the United States—between 2000 and 2016. In Canada, it found opposition was more likely and more intense in wealthier communities; in the U.S., communities with a higher proportion of white residents were more likely to resist proposed projects. The authors described that opposition as a form of “energy privilege,” which, they said, could slow the energy transition and extend reliance on fossil fuel plants, which have largely been located in lower-income communities and communities of color.
A majority of wind and solar developers who responded to the Berkeley Lab survey agreed that opposition to projects was more likely to arise in mid- to high-income communities.
“It speaks to that access: Who has the ability to say ‘no’ to potential economic development opportunities that may not be their preferred path forward for their community?” said Robi Nilson, a postdoctoral researcher at Berkeley Lab and one of the study’s authors. Nilson said communities “least likely or least able to resist them” are often saddled with less-desirable industries or facilities.
Regardless of the factors, some opposition is inevitable, Nilson said. “It makes sense that there’s growing opposition as projects get bigger and are in more places.”
Emma Foehringer Merchant
Contributor
Emma Foehringer Merchant is a journalist who has covered environmental issues ranging from disasters to wonky energy regulations to air pollution. She’s reported on the environment and energy for publications including The Boston Globe Magazine, The New Republic, Vice News, and Grist. Most recently, Emma covered clean energy as a staff writer for Greentech Media and helped alums of that organization form a new publication called Canary Media. She’s attending MIT’s Graduate Program in Science Writing and holds a bachelor’s degree in environmental analysis from Pomona College, where she lived through a California drought while studying how climate change is impacting the state’s environment and people.
