Friday, October 31, 2025
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
Environmental Magazine
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water
No Result
View All Result
Environmental Magazine
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water
No Result
View All Result
Environmental Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home Water

Clean Shipping Alliance criticises move to restrict use of scrubbers in ports

July 2, 2025
in Water
A A

The Clean Shipping Alliance, a representative body within the shipping industry, has criticised a decision last week by North Atlantic marine protection body OSPAR to limit the use of Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems (also called “scrubbers”) in ports and inland waters starting in 2027. 

These systems help reduce the air pollution created by shipping but also commonly discharge wastewater into the sea.

The OSPAR decision to restrict the use of scrubbers in the North Atlantic ports and inland waters of the Contracting Parties (member states) in OSPAR, has created a questionable precedent, says the CSA. Most (not all) of the Environmental Ministers present agreed to creating what is in fact a major regional maritime regulation independent of discussion with IMO, the leading authority issuing EGCS Guidelines, and the globally recognized competent international organization for marine EGCS over the last decades.

CSA Chairman Captain Mike Kaczmarek said: “We don’t see the OSPAR move as ‘historic’ but it is unfortunate and unnecessary. Of course this will have an impact, including further complicating today’s already complex map of environmental restrictions for shipping operations in Europe, but above that we are very disappointed in the low level of credible science used by OSPAR to support this decision, including a total lack of evidence of any harm to the marine environment. There clearly is no environmental urgency to justify this rush to regulate.”

He continues: “Even more surprising is that almost no environmental risk assessments — we only know of one or two, which showed little/no risk — have been conducted by the OSPAR members for the operations of these systems in their own waters, as is recommended by the IMO before considering any restrictive actions. And all the members, including Denmark, Sweden, and Finland, which have their own restrictions starting this week, have this technical ability”.

Although some authorities are still relying on a precautionary principle to justify EGCS restrictions, this should only be invoked when supported by some scientifically credible evidence; the OSPAR reference studies, however, don’t appear to rise to this level. Also, although it is not clear that they have been considered by OSPAR, there is a large and growing body of credible scientific studies, from many sources, that fully evaluate EGCS discharge water quality, the potential for accumulation, and risk to the environment, including in ports.

Captain Kaczmarek adds: “We believe that responsible regulators and scientists in each OSPAR member state may wish to have a thorough technical understanding of their subject before actually initiating restrictions, and the coming period would be well used by OSPAR members to fill in data gaps by conducting sampling, testing, and risk evaluations in their own waters, using standard scientific methods, and not just rely on speculative reports by others.”

ShareTweetSharePinSendShare

Related Articles

Water

Remote cameras enhance visibility of Swiss flood risk

October 20, 2025
Water

Northumbrian Water appoints installation partner for smart metering programme

October 13, 2025
Water

Flooding victims need single trusted line to expert help and clear accountability, MPs recommend

October 13, 2025
Water

Report details staggering extent of water leaks problem, and how real-time monitoring can help

October 10, 2025
Water

Yorkshire Water models sewer data availability

October 7, 2025
Water

Water contamination detection tool shortlisted for national award

October 6, 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

In a Steel Town Outside Pittsburgh, an Old Fight Over Air Quality Drags On

January 28, 2024

They Fell Sick After Cleaning Up a TVA Toxic Disaster. A New Book Details Their Legal Battle

December 23, 2024

Don't miss it

Energy

A Home Energy Fair Offers a Counter Narrative to Cynicism About Climate Change

October 30, 2025
Air

ExxonMobil Chemical fined £176,000 for six days of flaring

October 30, 2025
News

Water sector needs to think differently about its urgent skills gap, says CIWEM report

October 30, 2025
News

UK produces its first home-sourced lithium hydroxide, in Cornwall

October 30, 2025
Fossil Fuels

Four Governors Whose States Rely on PJM Want Data Centers to Guarantee Their Own Power

October 30, 2025
Fossil Fuels

AI Is Pushing Climate Goals Out of Reach, New Reports Say

October 29, 2025
Environmental Magazine

Environmental Magazine, Latest News, Opinions, Analysis Environmental Magazine. Follow us for more news about Enviroment and climate change from all around the world.

Learn more

Sections

  • Activism
  • Air
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Fossil Fuels
  • News
  • Uncategorized
  • Water

Topics

Activism Air Climate Change Energy Fossil Fuels News Uncategorized Water

Recent News

A Home Energy Fair Offers a Counter Narrative to Cynicism About Climate Change

October 30, 2025

ExxonMobil Chemical fined £176,000 for six days of flaring

October 30, 2025

© 2023 Environmental Magazine. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water

© 2023 Environmental Magazine. All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.