Thursday, July 24, 2025
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
Environmental Magazine
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water
No Result
View All Result
Environmental Magazine
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water
No Result
View All Result
Environmental Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home Water

Clean Shipping Alliance criticises move to restrict use of scrubbers in ports

July 2, 2025
in Water
A A

The Clean Shipping Alliance, a representative body within the shipping industry, has criticised a decision last week by North Atlantic marine protection body OSPAR to limit the use of Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems (also called “scrubbers”) in ports and inland waters starting in 2027. 

These systems help reduce the air pollution created by shipping but also commonly discharge wastewater into the sea.

The OSPAR decision to restrict the use of scrubbers in the North Atlantic ports and inland waters of the Contracting Parties (member states) in OSPAR, has created a questionable precedent, says the CSA. Most (not all) of the Environmental Ministers present agreed to creating what is in fact a major regional maritime regulation independent of discussion with IMO, the leading authority issuing EGCS Guidelines, and the globally recognized competent international organization for marine EGCS over the last decades.

CSA Chairman Captain Mike Kaczmarek said: “We don’t see the OSPAR move as ‘historic’ but it is unfortunate and unnecessary. Of course this will have an impact, including further complicating today’s already complex map of environmental restrictions for shipping operations in Europe, but above that we are very disappointed in the low level of credible science used by OSPAR to support this decision, including a total lack of evidence of any harm to the marine environment. There clearly is no environmental urgency to justify this rush to regulate.”

He continues: “Even more surprising is that almost no environmental risk assessments — we only know of one or two, which showed little/no risk — have been conducted by the OSPAR members for the operations of these systems in their own waters, as is recommended by the IMO before considering any restrictive actions. And all the members, including Denmark, Sweden, and Finland, which have their own restrictions starting this week, have this technical ability”.

Although some authorities are still relying on a precautionary principle to justify EGCS restrictions, this should only be invoked when supported by some scientifically credible evidence; the OSPAR reference studies, however, don’t appear to rise to this level. Also, although it is not clear that they have been considered by OSPAR, there is a large and growing body of credible scientific studies, from many sources, that fully evaluate EGCS discharge water quality, the potential for accumulation, and risk to the environment, including in ports.

Captain Kaczmarek adds: “We believe that responsible regulators and scientists in each OSPAR member state may wish to have a thorough technical understanding of their subject before actually initiating restrictions, and the coming period would be well used by OSPAR members to fill in data gaps by conducting sampling, testing, and risk evaluations in their own waters, using standard scientific methods, and not just rely on speculative reports by others.”

ShareTweetSharePinSendShare

Related Articles

Water

Project begins outfall-by-outfall monitoring in real-time on River Roding

July 16, 2025
Water

SCOPE supports Welsh Water response to severe storm

July 16, 2025
Water

Yorkshire schools SuDS partnership boosts flood resilience

July 8, 2025
Water

Open-source AI models support water quality monitoring

July 8, 2025
Water

Puraffinity and US Army Corps of Engineers partner to advance PFAS remediation technologies

July 8, 2025
Water

Improving predictions of flood severity, place and time with AI

July 4, 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

A Company’s Struggles Raise Questions About the Future of Lithium Extraction in Pennsylvania

September 19, 2024

Microsoft and Apple among winners of Lighthouse Awards

June 20, 2024

Don't miss it

Air

Non-road machinery decarbonisation – operators share perspectives

July 23, 2025
Fossil Fuels

Startups Make Products from the Carbon in Fossil Fuels

July 23, 2025
News

UK demonstration of hydrogen storage using LOHCs is a world-first

July 23, 2025
Energy

Republican Excitement for Wyoming Rare Earth Mining Contradicts the Party’s Disdain for Renewables

July 23, 2025
Fossil Fuels

PJM Capacity Price Hits Cap as Clean Energy Projects Remain Stalled

July 22, 2025
Energy

Canadian Company Exits Contentious Uranium Mining Project in Western Alaska

July 22, 2025
Environmental Magazine

Environmental Magazine, Latest News, Opinions, Analysis Environmental Magazine. Follow us for more news about Enviroment and climate change from all around the world.

Learn more

Sections

  • Activism
  • Air
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Fossil Fuels
  • News
  • Uncategorized
  • Water

Topics

Activism Air Climate Change Energy Fossil Fuels News Uncategorized Water

Recent News

Non-road machinery decarbonisation – operators share perspectives

July 23, 2025

Startups Make Products from the Carbon in Fossil Fuels

July 23, 2025

© 2023 Environmental Magazine. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Recycling
  • Air
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Water

© 2023 Environmental Magazine. All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.