Solid-state batteries—which pack more energy into each unit of volume than current batteries and will stretch the range of electric vehicles—have long felt just out of reach.
But they are getting close, and recent progress helps to clarify when the first models may arrive.
Samsung SDI said in March that it will produce solid-state batteries for use in high-end vehicles by 2027. The vehicles would be able to travel more than 600 miles before needing to be recharged. Samsung, based in South Korea, didn’t say which automakers would use the battery, but the company has relationships with GM, Hyundai and Stellantis.
A range of 600 miles would be roughly double the ranges of today’s most popular models.
Explore the latest news about what’s at stake for the climate during this election season.
Samsung’s announcement puts it ahead of Toyota, which told investors in January that it is on track to develop a solid-state battery by 2027 or 2028, followed by a ramp-up to mass production.
QuantumScape, based in California, said in July that it had reached an agreement to license its solid-state battery technology to Volkswagen to develop for mass production. The announcement did not include a timetable for when those vehicles might be available to consumers.
Most EV batteries on the market today have a liquid or gel electrolyte, the material through which lithium ions flow as the battery charges and discharges. In a solid-state battery, the electrolyte is a solid, usually ceramic or polymer. The design allows for much higher energy density, faster charging times and a reduction of fire risk.
Other battery makers—such as Blue Solutions of France, Factorial Energy of Massachusetts and Solid Power of Colorado, among others—are working on their own solid-state systems, with timelines that would have their products on the market by about 2030. Nissan has an in-house team working on solid-state batteries and is aiming for a public rollout by 2029.
Tesla is a special case, saying little about plans to develop such batteries.
But a lack of publicity isn’t the same as a lack of progress, said Rory McNulty, product director for new technology at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, a firm that tracks market information related to battery mineral supply chains.
“The thing you always get with these larger companies is that they don’t need to shout about the fact they’re qualifying technologies,” he said. “They can be much more of a closed book about it.”
This is different from battery startups that need to publicize their progress to be able to raise money from investors and attract industry partners.
So far, I’ve been talking about the companies that sell batteries and vehicles in the United States.
In China, next-generation batteries have already arrived. China is the world’s leading EV market, but its cars are walled off from U.S. consumers by tariffs.
Nio, a China-based automaker, has a semi-solid-state battery that offers more than 600 miles of range and is now available in the ET7 luxury sedan. Several other Chinese companies say they are right behind.
Nio is using a battery manufactured by WeLion, also based in China. One interesting part of the product rollout is that Nio is doing battery swapping, in which drivers of the vehicle can go to a service center where machines quickly remove the existing EV battery and install the new one. Nio and WeLion can analyze the used batteries to improve how they work.
CATL, the Chinese company that leads the world in battery production, has been developing solid-state batteries at the same time that its chief executive has downplayed the viability of the technology. Robin Zeng told the Financial Times in March that a variety of technical challenges have slowed progress, including some tests in which lithium expands during charging and damages the battery.
Zeng also questioned whether Toyota is really on pace to have a solid-state battery by 2027, based on his knowledge of the obstacles. (Plenty of others share his skepticism of Toyota, which has been slow to develop all-electric vehicles relative to its peers.)
China is taking steps to make sure it retains its lead in battery technology. The Chinese government said in May that it would spend the equivalent of $830 million to finance a collaboration between six of the country’s leading battery and automobile manufacturers to rapidly deploy solid-state batteries.
The companies are CATL and WeLion, along with BYD, FAW, Geely and SAIC Motor, according to Reuters.
The initiative “is a big statement of intent from the Chinese government to say, ‘Solid-state batteries are something we care about. We need to be focused on this,’” McNulty said.
This story is funded by readers like you.
Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.
Donate Now
We don’t yet know if companies will figure out how to mass produce solid-state batteries, but it is encouraging that Nio and WeLion have been able to make semi-solid-state batteries. Those are a step toward a solid-state battery, with some solid components that allow for higher energy density but without some of the design challenges of a solid-state product.
“A major question remains around the need for [solid-state batteries] when semi-solid could be good enough,” Max Reid, an EV and battery analyst for Wood Mackenzie, said in an email.
He emphasized that there are many ways to improve on current battery technologies without making the leap to a solid-state design. From a consumer’s point of view, the most important things are the vehicle’s range, charging time, reliability and price, and the technology providing those features isn’t as much of a concern.
The upshot is that EV ranges are going to increase under a variety of scenarios for developing new technologies. I expect to see high-end models by 2027 and 2028 with about double today’s typical ranges.
By about 2030, the long ranges will be available on cars the average consumer is more likely to drive.
At that point, when a typical EV has more range than a typical gasoline model has with a tank of gas, and when an EV costs about the same or less than its gasoline equivalent, we can begin working on our eulogy for the internal combustion engine.
Harris Stirs Hope for a New Chapter in Climate Action: Kamala Harris, if elected president, would likely follow through on the promise of the Inflation Reduction Act and continue the Biden administration’s rapid progress on addressing climate change and encouraging development of renewable energy, as my colleague Marianne Lavelle reports. This is close to the opposite of what to expect under a second Donald Trump term.
How the Presidential Election May Affect FERC’s Grid Policy: Donald Trump, if elected president, could name a chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission who may undermine this year’s landmark rule to streamline planning of interstate power lines. But a Trump appointee is unlikely to have enough support from other commission members to overhaul the rule right away, as Peter Behr and Francisco “A.J.” Camacho report for E&E News. If Harris is elected, the commission would likely continue on its current path of maximizing its authority to encourage interstate power lines, which is essential for delivering electricity from renewable energy plants.
Ford Delays New EV Plant and Cancels Electric Three-Row SUV: Ford is recalibrating its EV strategy, delaying the start of production at a new Tennessee plant and ceasing plans for an electric three-row SUV. The company had previously planned to start vehicle production at the plant next year, but now will just be making battery cells there, with vehicle production to begin later, as Michael Wayland reports for CNBC. Ford said it is prioritizing development of gas-electric hybrid models and electric commercial vehicles.
Biden Administration Issues First Floating Wind Research Lease to the State of Maine: The Department of the Interior has issued a lease to the state of Maine to do research on floating wind turbines and install 12 turbines in waters off its coast, as Nichola Groom reports for Reuters. Construction would not begin for several years, allowing time to understand how to handle engineering of floating turbines that are held in place by cables, as opposed to turbines on fixed foundations. Floating wind turbines are not a new technology, but they have yet to be deployed in the United States.
Georgia Voters Could Make or Break Their State’s Clean Energy Jobs Boom: Georgia has been a bipartisan success story by attracting jobs in renewable energy and electric vehicles under the leadership of President Joe Biden and Gov. Brian Kemp, as Julian Spector reports for Canary Media. But this progress is at risk in the presidential election as Donald Trump has said he would like to repeal aspects of the Inflation Reduction Act, which is a key part of the manufacturing boom in Georgia and other states. Georgia voters will play an outsize role in deciding what happens because of the likelihood that the winner of the state’s electoral votes will win the presidency.
Inside Clean Energy is ICN’s weekly bulletin of news and analysis about the energy transition. Send news tips and questions to [email protected].
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,